Now presenting the Mountain West Conference 2.0…
Let’s get the disclaimer out of the way. I am a BYU fan and I look forward to the uncharted territory of independence for this team. However, I have mostly enjoyed our stay in the Mountain West Conference; it has provided stiff competition in football and basketball and in all other sports. I am glad to be rid of the Mountain Channel, to the portion of my energy and enthusiasm that was invested in supporting BYU football the Mountain Channel was the bane of my existence. But let’s exam what the Mountain West will look like in the coming years with all these change-ups.
This summer the Big 10 invited Nebraska to its conference, which started a series of conference mix ups that inflated the Pac 10 with schools struggling in football. It bolstered the Big 10, shrank the Big 12, and nearly decimated the WAC. Interesting enough though, the conference paradoxically the most impacted is possibly the least affected, that being the Mountain West Conference.
As a quick recap, the MWC invited Boise State, who enthusiastically joined, but then lost Utah to the Pac-10, who hoped to clean the Big XII’s clock, but instead inherited an absolutely pathetic Colorado team, and a subpar Utah. BYU lost its incentive to remain in the MWC and truly wanted a reasonable TV contract, so they toyed with independence. However, the MWC tried to undercut their attempts by inviting Nevada and Fresno State to the MWC, who were more than ready to accept, presumably giving BYU no place to go in other sports. BYU went independent anyways. We took a brief break from mixing things up, namely the college football season. At the end of it TCU accepted their invitation to the Big East, and Hawaii pulled it together well enough during the season to receive their invitation to the MWC. And here we are.
Who knows if this will be it or if there will be more changes, but the bottom line is that the MWC conference actually looks about as good as it did before. Consider this- Boise State, unjustly ranked 10, all the other one-loss teams lost to an inferior opponent than Nevada (except Stanford), replaces TCU. They both have had very comparable seasons and judging from the past two year’s bowl games they are evenly matched. Nevada at fifteen replaces Utah at 18. Hawaii at 24 replaces BYU, and Fresno State simply adds some competition. Those are the exterior changes that keep the MWC competitive. Within the conference Colorado State, New Mexico, and UNLV still struggle. The verdict isn’t out yet about Wyoming. They had a setback this year, but next year when their out of conference games include Texas State, Utah State, Bowling Green, and Weber State instead of Boise State, and Texas I think they’ll look better with their third season coach. San Diego State has made leaps and bounds this season. They lost to Missouri and BYU by a field goal, TCU by five (the closest any team got this season), and to Utah by two. I think they will remain competitive for a while with their new coach. Air Force will always be a tough team to play.
Which brings us to the question; what will happen to the MWC’s chance at an AQ bid? Even with TCU headed to the Big East, that conference still risks losing its AQ status. They are sending an unranked team to a BCS bowl game. TCU will give them a top-five team, West Virginia at 22, and then nobody even in the running. The MWC on the
other hand, will have two teams in the top 15, another in the top 25, and three, Air Force, SDSU, and Fresno State, in the running for being ranked. That’s even better than the ACC. They only have Virginia Tech a two loss team (one of those losses being to Boise State) at 13 and Florida State, a four loss team, at 24. Does the BCS really think they can keep the MWC out? Seriously? There might be some new teams in the conference, but in the end the Mountain Conference is still here, and they are still knocking on the door of the BCS.






