Chris Paul Trade

Sunday, 18 December 2011, 22:28 | Category : NBA
Tags : , , ,

L.A. Clippers, Chris Paul, Chauncey Billups, trade, New Orleans Hornets, point guard

When I first heard about the trade that would have sent Chris Paul to the Lakers I was furious.  Just when the Lakers were looking to be on the decline they acquire arguably the best point guard in the league and were working on another trade to bring in Dwight Howard.

But when I looked at the trade more closely, I realized that the trade was actually good news.  The Lakers lost all their length and size (the trait about their roster which gave so many teams such difficulty), and really did not have enough trade assets left to make a realistic run at Howard.  Also, Kobe doesn’t need a PG to set him up to be good.  That would mean that the Lakers’ two best players would excel with the ball in their hands.  To top it off, the Hornets actually won the trade with plenty of pieces to build around and/or trade.

Just as I was talking myself into the trade, I found out it had been vetoed by the league.  (Yes, there is a huge conflict of interest there, but I don’t want to get into that now.)

The Clippers trade, on the other hand, I thought was a great for the most part.  Other than Lakers fans, who doesn’t want to see Chris Paul lob passes to Blake Griffin all the time?  If Blake Griffin made the Clippers a must see team alone, good luck getting tickets now.  Was what they gave up worth it?

We all knew Chris Paul wasn’t going to come cheap (especially when the league got involved), but I can’t help but feel that the Clips slightly overpaid.  Eric Gordon is a stud and has a bright future.  Yes they have Chauncey Billups, who can hold his own, to replace Gordon, but he’s on his way out.  Gordon will soon be one of the best players at his position (if he’s not already).  With him they’d have a really nice young core of Gordon, Griffin, Paul, and DeAndre Jordan to build around for years to come.

Another issue with the trade is that they now have no depth, except at PG.  In a shorten, compacted season, they’re going to need to fresh legs.  They really need to look at trading Williams or Foye to get a little deeper at other positions, like center (but I think that’s obvious).

The Hornets got a lot of value out the trade, and if they play their cards right, they can get even more out of it and get a real foundation for a future going forward.  Chris Kaman’s expiring contract is one example of a trade piece they’ll have going forward.  However, judging by how well the past negotiations went, I don’t know how many teams are going to want to deal with Stern.

The Clippers may not be a realistic contender for a championship, but they certainly have become the team to see.

Fun with the NBA Trade Machine

Sunday, 28 August 2011, 18:24 | Category : NBA
Tags : , ,

Steve Nash, Mo Williams, Phoenix Suns, L.A. ClippersAfter thinking writing about where Tayshaun could end up next season, I decided to play with the NBA Trade Machine to see what I could come up with.  I know the Pistons would really like to get some value out of him in a sign and trade.  I think I may have found a great solution that benefits not only the Pistons, but the Suns and Clippers as well in this trade.  Here’s why each team leaves this trade a winner.  (Remember, the trade machine doesn’t include draft picks or cash considerations that could be tossed in to further sweeten the trade.)

Detroit Pistons:

Trade: Prince ($11.1- but will have a new contract), Maxiell ($5- 1 year), and Gordon ($37.3- 3 years) for a total of $27.7 million owed next season.

Acquire: Kaman ($12.2- 1 year) and Vince Carter ($18.3- 1 year) for a total of $30.5 million next season.

For the small net gain of $2.8 next season, Detroit clears out space at the forward positions to make room for the young guys while getting some much needed depth at C with a former All-Star.  By paying roughly $7 mil more to Carter next season, they are able to move one of their unmovable contracts.  There’s still a logjam at SG, but they’re not any worse off with Carter than they were with Gordon.  Both acquisitions come off the books after next season, clearing lots of needed room.

Phoenix Suns:

Trade: Nash ($11.7- 1 year), Childress ($27- 4 years), Lopez ($2.9- 1 year),  and Carter ($18.3- 1 year) for a total of $38.9 owed next season.

Aquire: Williams ($17- 2 years), Maxiell ($5- 1 year), and Gordon ($37.3- 3 years) for a total of $25.1 million next season.

While this trade does involve losing Steve Nash, it will save the Suns $13.8 million next season.  They also get the satisfaction of knowing they didn’t force one of the greatest PGs ever (who still doesn’t have a championship) to waste his final years in a rebuilding project pretending to be a contender.  They also get to enjoy watching Nash throw alley-oops to Griffin for the next couple (or however many years Nash has left) years.  While overpaid, they get a capable PG to hold the reigns for a couple years while they search for and groom their PG of the future.

They no longer have to worry about buying Carter out of his contract and can erase the mistake of overpaying Childress.  In return, Phoenix gets Gordon who is capable of carrying the offense and even helping on ball handling duty.  Last, but not least, they clear the starting spot at C for Gortat while picking up an energy PF/C to come off the bench.  All in all, the Suns put themselves in much better financial position while gaining buckets full of good Karma.

L.A. Clippers:

Trade: Kaman ($12.2- 1 year) and Williams ($17- 2 years) for a total of $20.7 owed next season.

Acquire: Prince ($11.1- but will have a new contract), Nash ($11.7- 1 year), Childress ($27- 4 years), and Lopez ($2.9- 1 year) for a total of $31.7 next season (depending on Prince’s contract).

It’s no secret the Clips have wanted to get rid of Kaman, and Williams was a consolation prize for getting rid of Baron Davis.  So the only loss is that they’ll be paying $11 million more on payroll next season, but teams save room so they can sign players that’ll make them better.  They have two positions that need serious upgrade: PG and SF.  Nash and Tayshaun are just that.  With these two, the Clips automatically become a real team that can make a run in the playoffs.  It’s been a while since any team from L.A. not called the Lakers has been able to say that.  The two throw-ins won’t hurt either.

Give me a good reason how this trade doesn’t make all three teams better off.  Why shouldn’t this trade happen?  What other trades would you like to see once the next season begins?

NBA Offseason: Pacific Division

Wednesday, 22 June 2011, 12:34 | Category : NBA
Tags : , , , ,

With the uncertainty of the looming lockout hanging over the NBA, teams having the daunting task of using this offseason to position themselves for success in whatever direction the new CBA takes them.  We are doing a division-by-division break down of what teams should be aiming to do this offseason.  We will analyze each team’s current situation, free agents, draft prospects, and whose contract the team would drop if the new CBA includes a new amnesty rule.  GMs, no need to worry.  We’ve got you covered.

Steve Nash, Phoenix Suns, Pau Gasol, Los Angeles Lakers, trades

The Pacific Division is officially in rebuild mode, with teams potentially shopping their stars.

Los Angeles Lakers: 2010-11 record: 57-25 (Pacific: 12-4)

What a difference a year makes.  The Lakers were the overwhelming favorites to return to the NBA Finals out of the West at the beginning of last year.   Then Pau Gasol all of a sudden got soft and Kobe Bryant started showing his age.  Andrew Bynum is not turning into the superstar they were hoping/expecting out of him.  With Kobe’s window closing, the Lakers may need to infuse some new blood into the organizing quickly.

Free Agents: Shannon Brown has a player option and Joe Smith and Theo Ratliff are the only other two FAs for the Lakers.  They don’t have enough money to spend on free agents to upgrade that scrubby bench of theirs so the Lakers can only improve through trades.  Andrew Bynum is still an intriguing trade chip (although not as much as a couple of years ago) so they can potentially make a move that could give them the depth they need.

Draft: Los Angeles Lakers: No first round pick.  At least Kobe can’t whine about not being the one to make the pick.

Amnesty: Clearly Laker fans could do without Luke Walton, but he only has two years left and could possibly be a trade throw-in.  Ron Artest (3 years and $22 million), on the other, has more time an money left on his contract and not exactly tradeable.  His production has gone down and his sanity isn’t improving.  Clear him out and make room for the future.


Phoenix Suns: 2010-11 record: 40-42 (Pacific: 9-7)

Phoenix needs to decide if it is going to rebuild or reload.   The problem is, rebuilding means moving on from the Steve Nash era and letting Grant Hill go.  My guess is, Phoenix will play the upcoming year with their same roster and see what happens.  They could have some interesting trade chips during the trade deadline like Vince Carter and his expiring contract.  If the Suns stay patient, they will have a lot of payroll flexibility the following offseason when some big names become free agents.

Free Agents: Grant Hill and Aaron Brooks (restricted).   The Suns don’t really have to have Grant Hill, but he is well-liked in Phoenix and he probably doesn’t want to go anywhere else at this stage in his career.  Aaron Brooks can give Nash the rest he needs every game so he may stay as well.  They have been involved in a lot of trade talks, but I don’t expect the Suns to do much during this offseason despite the many flaws they have.

Draft: At 13, Jimmer would be an ideal pick because Steve Nash needs a lot of rest these days and the Suns’ system is the kind that Fredette could thrive in. I don’t think he will last until the 13th pick after his impressive workouts.  The Suns should go for someone who can create his own shot.  They don’t really have that guy anymore other than half man Vince Carter (I should say they need someone who can create and make the shots).  Alec Burks and Klay Thompson are two high scoring Jimmer types that could thrive in the Suns’ system as well.

Amnesty: The Suns overpaid several semi-productive role players instead of using that money to pay someone impactful, and Josh Childress (4 years; $27 million) is somehow the greatest benefactor.  He’s buried deep on the bench and no one’s trading for him.  Four years is too long to wait this contract out.  Cool hair though.


Golden State Warriors: 2010-11 record: 36-46 (Pacific: 5-11)

The Warriors have some talented players, but I don’t see how they can win with this team.  None of their starting wings (Stephen Curry, Monta Ellis, and Reggie Williams) can play a lick of defense.  They are talented scorers, but they can’t stop anyone.  Their big free agent acquisition from last offseason (David Lee) can’t defend anyone either.  And somehow their new coach, Mark Jackson, is already preaching defense.  It’s a bad situation for an entertaining team.   Also, Monta Ellis is one of those guys who is destined to be a major scorer on a bad team.  You aren’t going anywhere if he is your best player.

Free Agents: Reggie Williams (restricted), Acie Law, Al Thornton, Vladimir Radmanovic, Louis Admundson (player option).  Thornton and Admundson are good defenders off the bench so they need to retain them.  I think they should let Williams walk and get some diversity on the wing.  The Warriors should do everything they can to get Shane Battier.  He would inject some defensive intensity and veteran leadership to the young team.

Draft: With the 11th pick, the Warriors should get a big man that can run the court in their high paced offense.  Kawhi Leonard just might fall enough for them to snatch him.   He would provide athleticism and energy while deferring to the shooters on offense.   Marcus Morris would be an interesting addition because of his scoring ability.

Amnesty: It’s time to part ways with Ellis and Biedrins, but both are reasonably priced that they can find somebody to take them even if it’s just for beans in return.  But that’s better than paying them to play for someone else.  David Lee (5 years; $68 million) is a good player, but they’re paying him way too much for a player that can’t defend.  The Warriors just have to decide if it’s worth paying Lee that much money to not play for them.


Los Angeles Clippers: 2010-11 record: 32-50 (Pacific: 7-9)

It is really too bad that the Clippers can’t draft Kyrie Irving to throw the ball to Blake Griffin for the next ten years. Griffin is the best thing that has happened to the Clips in a long time though. They finally have someone to build around. Eric Gordon and Eric Bledsoe are good piece to have too. The Clippers are getting close to contending and the future looks bright.

Free Agents: DeAndre Jordan (restricted), Brian Cook (player option), and Jamario Moon are the main FAs. I think the Clips have to resign Jordan to a multi-year deal. He does the dirty work on defense so Blake Griffin can do his thing with the ball. They are a good combo down low. The Clippers also will have a lot of money to spend in the 2012 offseason so they may stand pat one more year. If they can get a guy like Shane Battier or Andre Kirilenko, they may want to grab them this year.

Draft: No first round pick.  They gave away what turned out to be the #1 pick in the Baron Davis trade.  Oops.

Amnesty: Kaman ($12 million)  is in the last year of his deal and can therefore probably be traded easily enough (possibly in a sign an trade deal with Detroit for Prince).  Unless they’re ready to hand the reigns over to Bledsoe, Mo Williams ($17 million) may be worth hanging onto for a year or two.  If they upgrade at SF, then they may cut ties with Gomes (2 years; $8 million).  They could just as easily choose not to use amnesty on anybody.


Sacramento Kings: 2010-11 record: 24-58 (Pacific: 7-9)

The Kings have their two guys to build around, Tyreke Evans and DeMarcus Cousins.  They could still use another young stud and get some veterans to surround them.  I’m not sold on Tyreke being the kind of guy who will lead a team deep into the playoffs and Cousins is not a team player that will command the respect of his teammates.  They are both talented, but I’m not sold on the direction the Kings are going.   Having said that, they should continue to improve every year and may be able to get some pieces together to make things interesting.

Free Agents: Darnell Jackson (restricted), Marcus Thornton (restricted), Samuel Dalembert (thank goodness), and Marquis Daniels.  They have money to spend and since a lot of other teams are waiting for a year, they may want to make some noise.  They could gamble on a somewhat cheap Yao Ming or Michael Redd.  Or they can get some veterans like Andre Kirilenko or Tracy McGrady for leadership.  The Kings have the financial flexibility to be aggressive while everyone else waits.

Draft: They have the PG in Tyreke Evans and the big in DeMarcus Cousins so the Kings are headed in the right direction.   They have the 7th pick and should try to get a glue guy who doesn’t necessarily need the ball, but can still contribute.  One of the Euro Bigs or Tristian Thompson fit the bill.   I would not be at all surprised if they picked Jimmer in an effort to fill seats though.

Amnesty: Seeing as how the Maloofs are exactly looking to spend a lot of money and the team has the most cap space in the league, they could simply chose not to use this.  After all, they do have to meet a minimum team salary.  However, depending on how they do in the draft and in the free agent market, they do have players it couldn’t hurt to cut ties with.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...